Re: merging appendix c and b

On 07/01/2021 10:35, E.A. Draffan wrote:
> +1 from me as well, although I often wonder if the word ‘business’ puts 
> off some organisations looking at the content.

Perhaps swap the two terms so "Policy" comes first?

Steve


> Best wishes
> 
> E.A.
> 
> *From:*Rachael Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>
> *Sent:* 07 January 2021 10:32
> *To:* public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org; Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: merging appendix c and b
> 
> *CAUTION:*This e-mail originated outside the University of Southampton.
> 
> I too support reducing the number of appendices. I prefer Steve’s 
> suggested title.
> 
> On Jan 7, 2021, 5:22 AM -0500, Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org 
> <mailto:stevelee@w3.org>>, wrote:
> 
>     On 06/01/2021 09:44, Lisa Seeman wrote:
> 
>         Is there any objection to merging appendix c ( business
>         consideration)
>         to appendix b (making a policy)?
> 
> 
> 
>     I think it is a benefit to readers to have fewer Appendices and so a
>     shorter less complex document. I also think whilst undoubtedly important
>     topics they *are* in the Appendices and both of interest to very similar
>     secondary audiences for the document.
> 
>     According to another email to the list it seems the thinking is that
>     this merged Appendix will be links to new pages on the wiki?
> 
>     So I have no objection to them being merged.
> 
>     Steve
> 
> 
>         Another important consideration, in your company policy is  business
>         considerations.
> 
>         We could change the title to "business considerations and making
>         a policy"
> 
> 
>     How about "Business and Policy Considerations"
> 
>     Steve
>

Received on Thursday, 7 January 2021 10:56:39 UTC