- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:45:31 +0200
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, janinas@amazon.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2021 14:46:23 UTC
Hi Folks As you may know COGA is part of two parent working groups. AG and APA. *AG* is the group that makes \wCAG - here is their charter: ag-charter <https://www.w3.org/2019/12/ag-charter> *APA *- Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group ]is to ensure W3C specifications provide support for accessibility to people with disabilities. The group does reviews of W3C specifications, development of technical support materials, collaboration with other Working Groups, and coordination of harmonized accessibility strategies within W3C. here is their charter: APA /charter.html <https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/charter-2021/charter.html> APA suggests that we no longer need to be part of their group and it would make things simpler if we are just AG However I feel that the gap analisis and issue papers, which are the basis of content usable, are typically more APA then AG. The user needs were also more for APA then AG. If we leave APA they may become out of scope. We definitely need better coordination with APA irregardless of who our parent group is. We have asked Janina to also write a bit on her perspective. let's discuss this more on the call tomorrow. Lisa
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2021 14:46:23 UTC