W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > December 2021

Re: please put a +1 if you are happy with the drafts

From: Rain Michaels <rainb@google.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 06:27:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJO5HutLmSC4Tjmt6R-VOMy7dUZ8M2QxMMEO-GR9W-XocRyHdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hello Lisa and COGA TF,

APA extended the original November 19 deadline to December 10 back in early
November for everyone because they had a delay in posting the documents and
review deadline. This was communicated to us both directly by APA as well
as through the APA review list. My apologies for the confusion.

For ease of access, here are the two documents that Julie has created and
shared to summarize our raw notes:

   - [draft] Summary of COGA response to NAUR
   <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lVkQv4_lKcuEyane3o2oDtC3Hzu_-YZRJKe8pSk7Qd4/edit>
   - [draft] Summary of COGA response to Remote Meetings
   <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SmQFRTb24YDMkVpb9Bb-NJ_QD-YJ_zfVpqGL50lr9j4/edit?usp=sharing>

Warmly,

Rain


On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 1:20 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Rain
>
> Were did you get this deadline from? From what I saw  "Comments are
> requested by *19th November 2021 "*
>  I know we requested more time, but I thought we had told janina we would
> have them in today - hence my rushing it (I also understood from thursday,
> that we would try for  a summary in a day or two but if not i would pick it
> up).
> At the very least we need to request from APA more time (which is what my
> draft issue effectively does).
> Julie, do you have a better draft for the issue? If so please send it to
> the list. We can continue working on the comments in google docs which is
> linked to from our response.
> All the best
> Lisa
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 6:50 PM Rain Michaels <rainb@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lisa and group:
>>
>> The deadline for us to provide the feedback is December 10 (Friday). I
>> would like to propose that we do this call for consensus and share after
>> our December 9 meeting (this Thursday), if that is okay with everyone.
>>
>> Julie has been working on a summary of our drafts to try to make them
>> more easily readable. Julie: what do you think is realistic for you to
>> complete and share the more readable summaries with the group?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Rain
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 6:12 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> please put a +1 if you are happy with the drafts issues for APA on
>>> natural language  interfaces and  remote meetings.
>>> I am sorry for the rush but the comments period is almost over, So I
>>> shou;ld post these issues tomorow morning if possible .
>>>
>>> All the best
>>> Lisa
>>>
>>>
Received on Monday, 6 December 2021 14:27:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:24:13 UTC