- From: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:01:20 +0100
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org
On 10/09/2020 14:36, Lisa Seeman wrote: > Hi folks > Hi Folks > > Here is the proposed process for sorting new issues, and for editing > patterns. Please give comments in the next 48 hours so we can start on it.. > > *sorting new issues * > > * we assign labels for what is the right topic > * schedule the discussions for each topic > * update our action lists such as list of edits etc or proposes > response. Discuss if non editorial and go though our consensus > processes for issue Sorry for late response - catching up after week away * Agree with Abi * Need care especally when issues cover multiple points * Where are our the action lists? Wiki? Google Spread sheet? Otherwise good > > * > Editing patterns* > firstly I suggest a small group to agree on the template ( Lisa John k, > Rachael and Steve if available?). Send changes to the list for > agreement and next call for consensus processes. (next week) > > Review 1: > Review the patterns and > 1. Make name changes or any structural changes > 2. Make any editorial changes from the issues > 3. Identify patterns that need more work (including from issues) I'd like to see the small structural changes I proposed made to all patterns - eg "Description" -> "What to Do". Not sure if you meant that for 1? We could start on 3 before 2 but accept there might be some issue based changes that cause rework. > Review 2 - For patterns that need more work (about 10%?) > 4. Asign editing patterns (start on 17th Sept) > 5. Review and edit changes following the template at docs.google. > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wffN29_8YxjeL4E_wUHtKt6AGo0q3d--6cx2zZjThgg/edit> - > and go though consensus process (medium) > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2020 12:01:27 UTC