RE: proposed process for new issues, and for editing patterns

Hi Lisa

Can I clarify a couple of points?


  *   Where will we be assigning labels for topics? Is this assigning a label on a GitHub issue?
  *   Suggest we maintain a list of labels/topics so that people can refer to this before assign a label to avoid creating new ones.

Otherwise fine with the proposal.

Best wishes

Abi

From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
Sent: 10 September 2020 14:37
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: proposed process for new issues, and for editing patterns

Hi folks
Hi Folks

Here is the proposed  process for sorting  new issues, and for editing patterns. Please give comments in the next 48  hours so we can start on it..

sorting  new issues

  *   we assign labels for what is the right topic
  *   schedule the discussions for each topic
  *   update our action lists such as list of edits etc or proposes response. Discuss if non editorial and go though our consensus processes for issue


Editing patterns
firstly I suggest a small group to agree on the  template ( Lisa John k, Rachael and Steve if available?). Send changes to the list for agreement  and next call for consensus processes.  (next week)

Review 1:
Review  the patterns and
1. Make name changes or any structural changes
2. Make any editorial changes from the issues
3. Identify patterns that need more work (including from issues)

Review 2 - For patterns that need more work (about 10%?)
4. Asign editing  patterns (start on 17th Sept)
5. Review and edit changes  following the template at docs.google.<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1wffN29_8YxjeL4E_wUHtKt6AGo0q3d--6cx2zZjThgg%2Fedit&data=01%7C01%7Ca.james%40soton.ac.uk%7C118589b210c941f0499608d8558ea961%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=j11%2B1eH91910z42rHVAqD%2BwNzBKJLJH7NW1rq8fvFuQ%3D&reserved=0> - and go though consensus process (medium)