- From: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:15:06 +0000
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org
On 10/11/2020 15:35, Lisa Seeman wrote: > I am not sure i like success examples and failure examples using the words = > "use" and avoid" > > They give the expectation of a complete list and not an example Interesting, I had not thought of that implication, but do see how it might be interpreted that way. However the sections is named 'Examples' which counteracts that. I think they are a reasonable compromise but would like to find better if we can . > Maybe we should try another term, The titles "use" and "avoid" where chosen as we have to avoid using WCAG-style formal language. And after some brainstorming if I recall. For the web prototype [1] we tried "Sufficient" and "Insufficient" but they were felt to be, er, insufficient. Perhaps as they are not easy read? > or make the examples more complete (this = may delay publication but are more likely to be testable) I suggest we realistically cannot get close to 'complete' lists for all Patterns. Plus adding more examples would swell the size of the Design Guide even further, making it less approachable. There's room for another practical examples resource though, possibly as an expansion of the Web Design Guide. The current guide of around 2 entries for each case seems good to me. Steve 1:https://w3c.github.io/wai-coga/coga-draft/guide/forgettable/easy-login#examples
Received on Monday, 16 November 2020 11:15:13 UTC