Re: Proposed glossary entries

This looks very good.  Thank you.I think it is good enough for a wide review draft, but maybe intergration into the wai glossary is a bit earlyAll the bestLisa SeemanLinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Wed, 20 May 2020 13:33:00 +0300  stevelee@w3.org  wrote ----Thank you Abi and Jennie

Could I suggest we consider seeing if our entries could be added to the 
WAI website resource so there is a single point of reference?

That will make it easier for developers to find and use, plus should 
also ease maintenance, especially now the formats are similar.

We can always explore the option after this Wide Review release if there 
is not enough time.

Apologies if you were already suggesting this.

Steve

On 19/05/2020 18:22, James A. wrote:
> Hello everyone
> 
> Jennie and I have been working on the glossary task. We found that the 
> current W3C WAI page on abilities and barriers 
> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/people-use-web/abilities-barriers> contained 
> descriptions of many of the cognitive difficulties that we were 
> attempting to define. As these were clear and easy to read, as well as 
> already in use by W3C, we felt that we should use these as a starting 
> point and adopt this style for the additional entries we require.
> 
> We have created a glossary from the WAI definitions and have added 
> additional entries to cover the our prioity list in the same style. This 
> has been reviewed by Rachael and EA so we feel that this is now ready to 
> go out as part of the wider review of content usable. The proposed 
> glossary is in a google doc at 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AuM-06Alk5VgVgFPTsJD2DcadIrcGIRVDcNgFwPiQRc/edit?usp=sharing 
> .
> 
> Best wishes
> 
> Abi
>