W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > February 2020

Re: Thoughts on editorial workflow that's easier to use

From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:41:48 +0000
To: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org>, Roy Ran <ran@w3.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2e0274e3-768d-137c-55d9-f50c52738c70@w3.org>
Actually, the sentence "The prioritisation is indicated by colour." is 
inaccurate. The prioritisation is also indicated in words at the bottom 
of the section (the same words as appear  in the key).

If i change the sentence to say "The prioritisation is indicated at the 
bottom of each section as per the following list. Colours are associated 
with them for those who find that useful." or some such, would that 
solve the problem?

ri


On 05/02/2020 15:20, Steve Lee wrote:
> I sent a PM about that :)
> 
> Steve
> 
> On 05/02/2020 15:03, John Foliot wrote:
>> JF winces...
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#use-of-color
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:53 AM r12a <ishida@w3.org 
>> <mailto:ishida@w3.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 04/02/2020 13:49, Steve Lee wrote:
>>      > BTW what is the significance of the colour Bars in your document?
>>
>>
>>     See
>>     
>> https://w3c.github.io/sealreq/gap-analysis/laoo-gap.html#prioritization
>>
>>     ri
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> *​John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC 
>> Representative
>> Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good
>> deque.com <http://deque.com/>
>>
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2020 15:41:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:24:05 UTC