- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:41:48 +0000
- To: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org>, Roy Ran <ran@w3.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Actually, the sentence "The prioritisation is indicated by colour." is inaccurate. The prioritisation is also indicated in words at the bottom of the section (the same words as appear in the key). If i change the sentence to say "The prioritisation is indicated at the bottom of each section as per the following list. Colours are associated with them for those who find that useful." or some such, would that solve the problem? ri On 05/02/2020 15:20, Steve Lee wrote: > I sent a PM about that :) > > Steve > > On 05/02/2020 15:03, John Foliot wrote: >> JF winces... >> >> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#use-of-color >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:53 AM r12a <ishida@w3.org >> <mailto:ishida@w3.org>> wrote: >> >> On 04/02/2020 13:49, Steve Lee wrote: >> > BTW what is the significance of the colour Bars in your document? >> >> >> See >> >> https://w3c.github.io/sealreq/gap-analysis/laoo-gap.html#prioritization >> >> ri >> >> >> >> -- >> *​John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC >> Representative >> Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good >> deque.com <http://deque.com/> >>
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2020 15:41:52 UTC