- From: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:29:48 +0000
- To: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>, "public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
You are right Steve .... Symbol libraries are what graphic designers and computer scientists might have and AAC users have symbol sets Best wishes E.A. Mrs E.A. Draffan WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103 http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk -----Original Message----- From: Steve Lee [mailto:stevelee@w3.org] Sent: 02 April 2020 09:24 To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org Subject: Re: Is "Symbols" the correct word when talking about inclusion. There was a suggestion that "symbol libraries" could be used as an alternative to Symbols Sets. Personally I think Symbols Set is the better understood term, at least in the AAC domain. Steve On 01/04/2020 18:33, Steve Lee wrote: > The W3C are working on accessibility guidelines for Virtual Reality > (XR) [1] > > In section 4.4 on "Immersive personalisation" it states > > > "Support Symbol sets so they can be used to communicate and layered > over objects and items to convey affordances or other needed > information in way that can be understood according to user preference." > > Now someone has queried the use of Symbols (via a Github Issue) > > > "I'm wonder if this is really representative of the need and > solution. When I read "symbol sets" I think unicode. When I think of > AAC, I think of pictures, and they're not the same. > > Can we be less specific" > > I responded[3] saying in general that is the correct term for > Cognitive accessibility AAC use and what we use here and in > personalisation. I also mentioned this is complicated as there are > different uses of several overlapping terms. > > What do people think? > > Steve > > 1: > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww. > w3.org%2FTR%2Fxaur&data=01%7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C18c0c695 > 5e3c472a92a008d7d6df37c2%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sd > ata=US3OU%2BxmSMoZS8PB4cSRSeODnrUWuLxWDInDob9u%2FAo%3D&reserved=0 > 2: > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww. > w3.org%2FTR%2Fxaur%2F%23immersive-personalisation&data=01%7C01%7Ce > ad%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C18c0c6955e3c472a92a008d7d6df37c2%7C4a5378f929f4 > 4d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=gKCGPZ471kAvc9FWYlS6vkf2qE%2FneWnq% > 2BXqMSj%2FVfTI%3D&reserved=0 > 3: > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith > ub.com%2Fw3c%2Fapa%2Fissues%2F69%23issuecomment-607376676&data=01% > 7C01%7Cead%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C18c0c6955e3c472a92a008d7d6df37c2%7C4a53 > 78f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=NSSrI4nF%2FyUfRdP%2FvsS97v0 > dUA5nt24%2FvezYoGth92M%3D&reserved=0 >
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2020 08:30:06 UTC