Re: interactive version of the design guide

This is too cool!!

** katie **

*Katie Haritos-Shea*


*Principal ICT Accessibility Architect, Vice President of Accessibility at
EverFi, **Board Member and W3C Advisory Committee Rep for Knowbility *

*WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA/QA/FinServ/FinTech/Privacy,* *IAAP CPACC+WAS = *
*CPWA* <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/cpwacertificants>

*Cell: **703-371-5545 <703-371-5545>** |* *ryladog@gmail.com
<ryladog@gmail.com>* *| **Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/>*

People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did, but they will
never forget how you made them feel.......

Our scars remind us of where we have been........they do not have to
dictate where we are going.




On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:17 AM lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> looking at
>
> https://w3c.github.io/wai-coga/coga-draft/guide/understandable/
>
> It is looking really good!
>
> I suggest the following structure (from the mock up draft in google docs)
>
>    - design is understandable
>
>
>    - User needs
>    - User testing
>    - Patterns
>       - The purpose of a page is clear
>       - Each step in a process is clear
>       - Visual heirarchy, headings and whitespace are effective
>       - Call out boxes
>       - Chunk media
>
> DO people think that is clearer? It might make the user needs and testing
> more clear
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>