- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 09:53:12 -0400
- To: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>
- Cc: lisa.seeman@zoho.com, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
I will resist my temptation to do more than simply note the singularity in the Subject: of this thread ... Because I'm responding to underscore the importance of Steve's point. It is very, very important to promise what you are very confident of delivering in a W3C Charter. Future viability as a continuing working group in W3C depends on doing what you said you were going to do, accomplishing the goals you formally set forth in the Charter--on delivering the goods. So, the best rule of thumb, imo, is under promise and over deliver. So, I also suggest not picking up stones to throw at this time. Janina Steve Lee writes: > I'm pretty sure very few specifics like Cognitive, Mobile or Low Vision are > mentioned for a good reason. IE Alistair asked me to include this: > > "Please note that the aim with a Charter is to only commit to things your > are sure can be achieved (including full approval) within the stated > timeframe, whilst leaving open the option to do other work. It is thus > carefully worded to achieve this." > > Steve > > On 17/06/2019 13:15, lisa.seeman wrote: > > Please note that the aim with a Charter is to only commit to things your > > are sure can be achieved (including full approval) within the stated > > timeframe, whilst leaving open the option to do other work. It is thus > > carefully worded to achieve this. -- Janina Sajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Monday, 17 June 2019 13:53:38 UTC