RE: proposal to address way-finding in the next version of the gap analysis

Hi Lisa and All,



Attached are:

* the Way Finding issue paper I submitted a year ago.

* a list of related research sources.



Also, since 2011 on my Clear Helper Website, I have been collecting Way Finding technology news articles<https://www.clearhelper.org/news/wayfinding/>.

John

John Rochford<http://bit.ly/profile-rj>
UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org
LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-rochford/>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.



-----Original Message-----
From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 11:09 AM
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: proposal to address way-finding in the next version of the gap analysis



Hi All





For the next version of the gap analysis we need to address way-finding





We had a similar issue on the personalisation task force. We addressed it by splitting it into modules. the main document then just had introduction and background and then linked to the modules





see https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/#modules <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__w3c.github.io_personalization-2Dsemantics_-23modules&d=DwMFaQ&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=_b85Bh3muMr0Jm9i3LaSIrLcVWsVOlAqPms2Ps-vMV4&s=PYsUVo53ndvFqHcNHbhpVFu8UkydgUpK2gCMqNuczXY&e=>





we could adopt a similar format for the next iteration of the  gap analysis. and have modules about





*    background people with cognitive disabilities,



*    the summary of issues,



*    the tables of how technology ,



*    and then in a separate list we can have  the sections of the appendix (persona, testing, requirements, making a policy etc)







(we can use the bullets in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mZakGwwp92Yyem4e5KW6C5fGsv0Q9aqA8Mk9rEF6nlY/edit?usp=sharing <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1mZakGwwp92Yyem4e5KW6C5fGsv0Q9aqA8Mk9rEF6nlY_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=DwMFaQ&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=_b85Bh3muMr0Jm9i3LaSIrLcVWsVOlAqPms2Ps-vMV4&s=1GkdJ4cAx4vJnWLE9V_XwxH6JJiFKvnmTpMKlk1X4W0&e=>  as a starting point)







We will still need to make each module readable. such as having a better flow of interconected issues. but this might be a good start



All the best





Lisa Seeman





LinkedIn <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__il.linkedin.com_in_lisaseeman_&d=DwMFaQ&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=_b85Bh3muMr0Jm9i3LaSIrLcVWsVOlAqPms2Ps-vMV4&s=wb8BMJ9JQllVgJuiLLf79yb8pT1DySdHTwI_imrfExU&e=> , Twitter <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_SeemanLisa&d=DwMFaQ&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=_b85Bh3muMr0Jm9i3LaSIrLcVWsVOlAqPms2Ps-vMV4&s=DeRrfAyCPX3P0Ecy_3L5G6jpeFNMCH_AkoeMwGYCD3E&e=>