Re: Call For Consensus. publish the appendix as a separate document

+1

I support the Appendix being a separate document.

G

*glenda sims* <glenda.sims@deque.com>, cpacc
<http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification>   | team a11y lead
| 512.963.3773

        deque systems <http://www.deque.com>  accessibility for good

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:44 PM, EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> I agree that it should be a separate document.  As an Appendix it is so
> large, although I hope this does not mean it gets lost in the mound of
> documents that seem to be around.
>
>
>
> Best wishes
>
> E.A.
>
>
>
> Mrs E.A. Draffan
>
> WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
>
> Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
>
> http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk
> <https://www.outlook.soton.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=69b1RzNTDwem3wbm4pLRmuYfTLt16YjcghtEpZBsF5Sebx78I2DUCA..&URL=http%3a%2f%2faccess.ecs.soton.ac.uk%2f>
>
> UK AAATE rep http://www.aaate.net/
> <https://www.outlook.soton.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=WUwOCw_4FszLSzcUbkoFdDkad8-Q_GrRfPYUJ_ol5l2ebx78I2DUCA..&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aaate.net%2f>
>
>
>
> *From:* lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
> *Sent:* 03 July 2018 17:02
> *To:* "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Call For Consensus. publish the appendix as a separate document
>
>
>
> Hi Folks
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus (CFC) — ends Sunday 8th of July  at 12:00 noon Boston
> time  (A bit longer the usual becuse of the holiday)
>
>
>
> We would like the appendix on how to make content usable for people with
> leaning and cognitive disabilities
> <https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-gap-analysis/#a-appendix-making-content-usable-for-people-with-cognitive-and-learning-disabilities> of
> the gap analysis <https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-gap-analysis/> to be
> published as a separate document.
>
>
>
> We discussed  this in last weeks call as part of the effort to make it
> easier for people to find the content that they need.
>
>
>
> The section on how to make content usable for people with leaning and
> cognitive disabilities
> <https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-gap-analysis/#a-appendix-making-content-usable-for-people-with-cognitive-and-learning-disabilities> is
> for content developers. However, the rest of the gap analysis is mainly for
> people inside the W3C to understand what needs to happen in the W3C
> standards world. That content is harder for content developers to
> understand. Having advice for them at the end of advice for working groups
> inside the W3C is confusing.
>
>
>
> Note that silence (non votes) will be understood as agreement.
>
>
>
> Thanks and ...
>
> All the best
>
>
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
>
>
> LinkedIn, Twitter
>
>
>
> All the best
>
>
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
>
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>