- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 22:38:32 +0000
- To: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AM5PR0902MB2002DE1624514F0133F8B52BB9820@AM5PR0902MB2002.eurprd09.prod.outlook.>
Hi Lisa, It wasn’t intended to be a controversial section, just a method of saying that it will point to WCAG when relevant. How about removing the heading (i.e. put it in the previous section), and just say: “For requirements which overlap with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, this document will include links to the appropriate WCAG 2.1 criteria.” Kind regards, -Alastair From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> Sent: 30 April 2018 17:38 To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org> Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> Subject: change to the section on user testing Hi i would like to make a change to the section on user testing in the appendix<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eyvLsF_akaSx_6xK5Bx3ylJePN0QJC-6wt42pKolLEE/edit#heading=h.ly540xcqt72c>from Content requirements For requirements which can be reliably tested, WCAG 2.1<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/> provides many well-tested success criteria. Where there is overlap this document will link to the appropriate WCAG 2.1 criteria. to Content requirements WCAG 2.1<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/> provides many well-tested success criteria, but there is a lack of success criteria that address the needed of people with cognitive and learning disabilities. The design requirements in this document can supplement to the WCAG success criteria Where there is overlap this document will identify the appropriate WCAG 2.1 criteria. I think this is more inline with the feelings of the group. All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Received on Monday, 30 April 2018 22:38:58 UTC