Re: Proposed wording for support personlization

If there are no objections I will change the wording on github



All the best

Lisa

---- On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:21:30 +0300 lisa.seeman<lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote ---- 

Hi folks

We need wording for personlization support. It will be better if we have wording that does not require adding semantics as that will be considored a burden and will get a lot of  resistance.  However we want to encourage it.


Do you like...


"
For pages   that contains  interactive controls or non essential content  one of the following is true:


- there is a mechanism is available for personlization of content that removes non essential functionality and content,  and enables the user to add symbols to interactive controls for essential functionality or


- contextual information can be programaticaly determined for essential functionality and content and essential functionality and content can be programaticaly identified.


"


we define Essential functionality and content as - the minimum functionality and content that is essential to identify the topic and fulfill the purpose of the content



All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter