- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:22:05 +0300
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2017 16:22:30 UTC
Yes, I agree it might get a second chance.But the task force should be aware that if they want these criteria to get though it will be ready helpful if people also respond to the call for consensus (CFC) All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:04:42 +0300 Alastair Campbell<acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote ---- Hi Lisa, I’d be careful calling it a vote, it doesn’t depend on what the percentages are, it depends on what the objections are. Having lots of positive votes is useful, but doesn’t mean it passes. I also wouldn’t call it lost yet, but there are objections to overcome. -Alastair From: "lisa.seeman" as not enoguh people voted for the call for consensus on the wcag list we now lost this sc
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2017 16:22:30 UTC