W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > August 2017

Re: Re: CFC - Purpose of Controls SC

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:04:42 +0000
To: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5AF227A4-7263-4818-B79C-EDC5CA7673F9@nomensa.com>
Hi Lisa,

I’d be careful calling it a vote, it doesn’t depend on what the percentages are, it depends on what the objections are.

Having lots of positive votes is useful, but doesn’t mean it passes.

I also wouldn’t call it lost yet, but there are objections to overcome.


From: "lisa.seeman"

as not enoguh people voted for the call for consensus on the wcag list we now lost this sc

Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2017 16:05:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:59 UTC