Re: COGA supplement to WCAG 2.1

It sounds like a great idea to me. Sounds like a great way to give
visibility and education on cognitive issues

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:55 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

>
> Hi Folks
>
> On tomorrows WCAG call we will probably discuss a proposal to publish a
> supplement to WCAG 2.1 that has additional information and recommendations
> for COGA. We could then:
>
>
>    - Add important pillers of accessibility to wcag 2.1 so that conforming to
>    wcag 2.1 help cognitive accessibility
>    - Put more details and full inclusion into a supplement that would not
>    be as  restricted by the WCAG's process and acceptance criteria
>
>
> Does that sound like a good change?
>
> I think it gives us the ability to write a full guidance on what to do to
> include coga use groups for though who want that guidance and still have an
> impact on WCAG.
>
> Also I am looking for some volunteers to help work out if these change
> impact what SC's we should put into WCAG
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>