It sounds like a great idea to me. Sounds like a great way to give visibility and education on cognitive issues On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:55 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > > Hi Folks > > On tomorrows WCAG call we will probably discuss a proposal to publish a > supplement to WCAG 2.1 that has additional information and recommendations > for COGA. We could then: > > > - Add important pillers of accessibility to wcag 2.1 so that conforming to > wcag 2.1 help cognitive accessibility > - Put more details and full inclusion into a supplement that would not > be as restricted by the WCAG's process and acceptance criteria > > > Does that sound like a good change? > > I think it gives us the ability to write a full guidance on what to do to > include coga use groups for though who want that guidance and still have an > impact on WCAG. > > Also I am looking for some volunteers to help work out if these change > impact what SC's we should put into WCAG > > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > >Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 13:07:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:58 UTC