- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 20:55:33 +0300
- To: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 24 April 2017 17:56:04 UTC
Hi Folks On tomorrows WCAG call we will probably discuss a proposal to publish a supplement to WCAG 2.1 that has additional information and recommendations for COGA. We could then: Add important pillers of accessibility to wcag 2.1 so that conforming to wcag 2.1 help cognitive accessibility Put more details and full inclusion into a supplement that would not be as restricted by the WCAG's process and acceptance criteria Does that sound like a good change? I think it gives us the ability to write a full guidance on what to do to include coga use groups for though who want that guidance and still have an impact on WCAG. Also I am looking for some volunteers to help work out if these change impact what SC's we should put into WCAG All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter
Received on Monday, 24 April 2017 17:56:04 UTC