RE: Timed Events SC For Review

Thanks Mike, really good feedbackHow about 




1.    -as the default, or
2.    -via a standardized system setting (for example, the user can choose an option that disables the storage of data) or
3.    -via an option to set a user preference that is  available from each stage of the task.@@



All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 18:51:17 +0300 Michael Pluke<Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com> wrote ---- 

    Hi
  
 There is just one part that doesn’t seem to read correctly to me. This is:
  
 @@No loss of data: The user can easily return to the same point in a task, without data loss, for a period of at least a week:
  1.    -as the default
  2.    -via a standardized system setting (for example, the user can choose an option that disables the storage of data)
  3.    -option to set a user preference that has a conformant interface and is directly available at each stage of the task.@@
  
 I think my problem is in understanding how the part before the colon links to the three bulleted items that follow. Normally I would expect that I could take the first part and then add either of the bulleted items and make a coherent sentence – but I can’t.
  
 The “as the default” makes total sense – by default I can always come back to the same point in the task and all my entered data will still be there.
  
 The “via standardized …” is a little less clear. I can see that there might be a setting that says, by default, I can come back without data loss but that I could set that setting to say that I don’t want data stored – which would prevent me from coming back in a week and having the data I entered still there. However, if I chose configure things this way then the “without data loss” does NOT apply.
  
 I am lost on the third option – don’t understand it at all.
  
 Best regards
  
 Mike 
  
    From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] 
 Sent: 25 September 2016 19:45
 To: Thad C <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>; public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
 Subject: Timed Events SC For Review
 
 
  
  I think http://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/timed-events.html is ready for WCAG review
   
 
  Does everyone agree?
 
   
 
  Thanks again Thaddeus for the great work.
 
   
  All the best
 
 Lisa Seeman
 
 LinkedIn, Twitter