Re: timeline

+1

I'm perfectly happy for you to edit any work I do. I take the view
they are community resources

Thanks for proposing this

Steve Lee
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com


On 13 September 2016 at 14:49, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
> Hi Folk
> Please send a +1 if you agree to this process
>
> I would like to proposes the following time line.
>
> A draft of each SC should be uploaded by the 4th October. The drafts do not
> need to be perfect, and you can put any known issues in the working groups
> notes at the bottom (such as mike did not like the conforment options, or
> you have no idea what conformance level to use). If you did not submit a
> draft by then we might reallocate your SC.
>
>
> I can volunteer to spend the next week reviewing them and sorting out any
> generic issues and specific issues.
> If people do not mind I can also edit them a bit such as  adding examples.
> (Let me know if you mind if I  edit your SC.)
>
> The week of the 18th  of October people can do edits that address any
> generic issues that were raised. Please clear some time that week.
>
> I can take another round of reviews the next week and then...
> We can address any individual issues, SC that are not done etc in November
>
> Does that sound OK?
>
> We have to make all our submissions to WCAG by December 1st.
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa SeemanLinkedIn, Twitter
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2016 15:37:59 UTC