+1 On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Thad C <inclusivethinking@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > On Sep 13, 2016 6:50 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > >> Hi Folk >> Please send a +1 if you agree to this process >> >> I would like to proposes the following time line. >> >> A draft* of each SC* should be uploaded by the *4th October*. The drafts *do >> not need to be perfect*, and you can put any known issues in the working >> groups notes at the bottom (such as mike did not like the conforment >> options, or you have no idea what conformance level to use). If you did not >> submit a draft by then we might reallocate your SC. >> >> >> I can volunteer to spend the next week reviewing them and sorting out any >> generic issues and specific issues. >> If people do not mind I can also edit them a bit such as adding >> examples. (Let me know if you mind if I edit your SC.) >> >> The* week of the 18th of October *people can do edits that address any >> generic issues that were raised. Please clear some time that week. >> >> I can take another round of reviews the next week and then... >> We can address any individual issues, SC that are not done etc in November >> >> Does that sound OK? >> >> We have to make all our submissions to WCAG by December 1st. >> >> >> All the best >> >> Lisa SeemanLinkedIn <http://il..linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter >> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> >> >> <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> >> >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2016 14:19:58 UTC