- From: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:35:44 +0000
- To: "Thaddeus ." <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
- CC: "lisa. seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
+1 but I am wondering if we use associated would they ask what do associated charges encompass? Best wishes E.A. Sent from my mobile phone On 19 Nov 2016, at 17:59, Thaddeus . <inclusivethinking@gmail.com<mailto:inclusivethinking@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 - I am wondering if the word "associated" may be useful. "Associated conditions and term ..." Best, Thaddeus On Nov 19, 2016 8:28 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>> wrote: Based on Mike's comments I would like to suggest the following change Old wording: Identify Charges: All types of charges and conditions are identified at the start of transaction tasks. When a minimum or typical value is known for a type of charge it must be be made clear at the start of the transaction task. New wording: Identify Charges: All types of charges are identified at the start of transaction tasks. When a minimum or typical value is known for a type of charge it must be be made clear at the start of the transaction task. Conditions and terms are available at the start of transaction tasks. Please raise any objection in the next 48 hours Note: this would allow terms to be under a link but charges to be clearly displayed. T All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Received on Saturday, 19 November 2016 22:36:22 UTC