- From: Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:01:41 +0000
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Lisa Here's a few non blocking comments. I'm not sure If I've lost my right to comment, but anyway this is really good! * "There is a wide range of cognitive disabilities; each type of impairment is different, with diverse symptoms and particular digital accessibility requirements. This adds to the complexity of knowing how to address user needs." -> perhaps add something to say every individual is unique? * Perhaps cleanly state where we are in the described process? * "selecting in phase one a limited scope of eight diverse disabilities" -> what are they? * Summary of the problem with flat design: -> I feel a major problem is the lack of very clear affordances. At least google and some shadows in Material design but that is very subtle Steve Lee OpenDirective http://opendirective.com On 9 February 2016 at 13:21, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > Hi Folks > > This is a call for consensuses. The latest version of the gap analysis and > roadmap is at > https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/ > > Please let us know if you approve this draft to be submitted to our parent > working groups as a first working draft. > > Please > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > Athena ICT Accessibility Projects > LinkedIn, Twitter > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:02:10 UTC