W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > August 2016

Draft SC for Obvious purpose

From: Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:49:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEsWMvRgPze132=iLVoHYH=PO+FwiyK+qQMYXGZT2s8Ars0Tng@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>

I've attached my initial attempt at the Obvious Purpose SC.

I'm happy to make the PR and receive feedback on GitHub rather than here.

What do I need to do to improve it or is it enough?

Thanks

Steve Lee
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com

text/html attachment: obvious-purpose.html

Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2016 17:50:19 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kurt Mattes: "Defining "rapid" in Rapid and Direct Feedback SC language"
Previous message: Steve Lee: "Gap analysis section name seems incorrect"
Next in thread: lisa.seeman: "Re: Draft SC for Obvious purpose"
Reply: lisa.seeman: "Re: Draft SC for Obvious purpose"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:56 UTC