- From: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:27:33 +0000
- To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <7181A95B72F5B04C94BEF10CEC91E7963E8EF47B@SRV00047.soton.ac.uk>
Thank you so much Lisa, but now I am wondering what one does if part of the Success Criteria for say chunking are found in a AAA criteria and with the new wording it appears to be AA? (Readable 3.1.5) Best wishes E.A. Mrs E.A. Draffan WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103 http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk<http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk/> UK AAATE rep http://www.aaate.net/ http://www.emptech.info<http://www.emptech.info/> From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] Sent: 25 August 2016 21:13 To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org> Subject: rewording of SC Hi Folks I have been working on rewording success criteria, with a lot of help so far from Mary Jo, Rich and my college Sharon Snider at IBM I think some of them are done, so take a look if your success criteria as new proposed wording, and also please comment on any proposed new wording, ONLY look at ones marked done or done-ish. (I might still change the ones marked done-ish but I think only slightly) Do not comment on the formatting. I know it needs work, and will get to it in the end - but it is too complex to maintain it in drafts as people use different tools. https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/rewroded%20sc%203.html FYI I am weighting for new wording from Katie, Mike and Steve All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2016 20:28:05 UTC