RE: volunteer for success criteria - division - clear layout

Hi

Look at https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/rewrodedsc2.html


Provide a clear structure that includes:
got split up into a few different SC . They are:




Information is provided in manageable chunks, that include:
ADD to 3.2.4
The main purpose of each page and section of content is obvious
Provide a clear and understandable layout that includes:
Information that is most likely to be important to the user is easy to find, such that: 



It is just a proposal and if you think the original is clearer - let us know!
All the best

Lisa SeemanLinkedIn, Twitter







---- On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:54:55 +0300 EA Draffan<ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote ---- 

    I have offered to work on 'clear layout' Please could you let me know if this one has been now been divided up and where I can find the section that I need to get into the new template.  Apologies if I missed the links in other emails but I am a bit swamped at the moment. 
  
 Best wishes
 EA 
  
 From: Thad C [mailto:inclusivethinking@gmail.com] 
 Sent: 12 August 2016 16:17
 To: lisa. seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
 Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
 Subject: Re: volenteer for success cryteria
  
 Good Morning,
 Just so I am 100% clear before I start can you send a link and a callout to the two SC criteria this has been broken into. It is probably clear if I look but just want 100% clarity before I start the work this weekend
 Best
 Thaddeus
     Thanks! Did you see the new proposal? It has been broken up into two criteria. Is that still ok?
  All the best Lisa Seeman
 

 
 LinkedIn , Twitter
 
 
 
 
   
 
  ---- On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 04:33:46 +0300 Thad C<inclusivethinking@gmail.com> wrote ----
 
   
 
   I will sign up for:
 Support is provided that help users complete and check their task, that includes: Note - will be broken up
 I will log into the system to official take onto the task in a bit.
 Thaddeus
  On Aug 11, 2016 7:34 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
       
 
  Hi Folks
 
   
 
  Please can you volunteer for putting success criteria into the WCAG template by signing up here:
 
 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/SC_todo_list
   
 
  Writing up according to the template: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/wiki/Proposals-for-new-Success-Criteria
 
   
 
  (also attached as html page - if you need it in MS word let me know)
 
   
 
  I made a sample at : https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/support-personalization.html (note this does not follow the template right now but has all the content - I will try to update it to the new template soon) 
 
   
 
  It is worth looking at wcag 2.O such as https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html to see the kind of wording used in WCAG.
 
   
 
  Comply with: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria
 
   
 
  Also, realy realy important , is we want to get these passed, to do this we realy want to:  
 
   
 
    show the benefits including any evidence and
 show test-ability
 make it clear
 
  you can see an example of a general test procedure here:  https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20160317/G92.html#G92-tests
 
   
 
  Some thing we might want to clarify s that people with cognitive disabilities include many types of disabilities such as
 
  people with 
 
    Language related disabilities
 Memory related disabilities
 Focus and attention related disabilities
 Executive and decision making disabilities
 
   
 
   
 
   
  All the best Lisa Seeman
 

 
 LinkedIn , Twitter