- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 22:06:46 +0300
- To: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1567afe10c0.c261739611373.6743008226910750866@zoho.com>
Hi Folks I am starting to work on restructuring some of the success criteria with long lists - and ones that overlap with each other a bit you can see my work at a temporary URL https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/rewroded%20sc.html (It might be helpful when thinking about volunteering for SC to see why some may be restructured...) All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 21:47:22 +0300 Rochford<john.rochford@umassmed.edu> wrote ---- Will do. -----Original Message----- From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:37 PM To: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> Cc: Rochford, John <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>; public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org> Subject: RE: volenteer for success cryteria John , maybe do the one on security, as that is unlikely to be restructured All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> , Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> ---- On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 21:23:01 +0300 lisa.seeman<lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote ---- Fantastic Can you add to the wiki what ones you can start with All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> , Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> ---- On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 21:15:55 +0300 Rochford<john.rochford@umassmed.edu <mailto:john.rochford@umassmed.edu> > wrote ---- Hi Lisa, I volunteer. I plan to work on it this Sunday. John John Rochford <http://profiles.umassmed.edu/profiles/display/132901> UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center Director, INDEX Program Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health www.DisabilityInfo.org Twitter: @ClearHelper <https://twitter.com/clearhelper> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message. From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com <mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com> ] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 11:02 AM To: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com <mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com> > Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org <mailto:public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org> > Subject: Re: volenteer for success cryteria Note I will try and restructure the long criteria over the weekend All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> , Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> ---- On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:33:32 +0300 lisa.seeman< <mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com> lisa.seeman@zoho.com <mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com> > wrote ---- Hi Folks Please can you volunteer for putting success criteria into the WCAG template by signing up here: <https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/SC_todo_list> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/SC_todo_list Writing up according to the template: <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/wiki/Proposals-for-new-Success-Criteria> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/wiki/Proposals-for-new-Success-Criteria (also attached as html page - if you need it in MS word let me know) I made a sample at : <https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/support-personalization.html> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/support-personalization.html (note this does not follow the template right now but has all the content - I will try to update it to the new template soon) It is worth looking at wcag 2.O such as <https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html> https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html to see the kind of wording used in WCAG. Comply with: <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria Also, realy realy important , is we want to get these passed, to do this we realy want to: * show the benefits including any evidence and * show test-ability * make it clear you can see an example of a general test procedure here: <https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20160317/G92.html#G92-tests> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20160317/G92.html#G92-tests Some thing we might want to clarify s that people with cognitive disabilities include many types of disabilities such as people with * Language related disabilities * Memory related disabilities * Focus and attention related disabilities * Executive and decision making disabilities All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> , Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2016 19:07:15 UTC