RE: Two important drafts to review.

+1

Though Garry has passed straight-street pending much needed resources.

Steve Lee
Sent from my mobile device Please excuse typing errors
On 9 Oct 2015 12:33, "Jamie Knight" <Jamie.Knight@bbc.co.uk> wrote:

> Helo,
>
> +1 to:
>
> "I don't agree with the following. I don't think any recommendation will
> be widely / sufficiently adopted if it requires people with disabilities to
> purchase something."
>
> IMHO We should work in the open via things like Straight Street and the
> noun project.
>
> Jamie + Lion
> _______________________________________
> From: Rochford, John [john.rochford@umassmed.edu]
> Sent: 09 October 2015 12:14
> To: lisa.seeman; public-cognitive-a11y-tf
> Subject: RE: Two important drafts to review.
>
> Hi Lisa and All,
>
>
>
> There's a lot to like about the drafts. I think the explanations and the
> examples are good. Grammar issues will have to be resolved in the final
> version.
>
>
>
> I think we should be sure what we are proposing cannot be accomplished
> within ARIA's current capabilities. I believe this is in line w/ Rich's
> previous comments.
>
>
>
> I wonder if our proposal will be obviated by GPII, as Steve may be
> suggesting.
>
>
>
> I don't agree with the following. I don't think any recommendation will be
> widely / sufficiently adopted if it requires people with disabilities to
> purchase something.
>
>
>
> "That means the end use (sic) could buy the symbols and use them across
> different devices or applications."
>
> John
>
> John Rochford<http://profiles.umassmed.edu/profiles/display/132901>
> UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
> Director, INDEX Program
> Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
> www.DisabilityInfo.org
> Twitter: @ClearHelper<https://twitter.com/clearhelper>
> [Facebook Button]<
> http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-England-INDEXShriver-CenterUMass-Medical-School/227064920160>[Twitter
> Button]<https://twitter.com/NEINDEX> [WordPress Logo] <
> http://www.disabilityinfo.org/blog/>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2015 9:27 PM
> To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
> Subject: Two important drafts to review.
>
>
>
> Hi Folks
>
>
>
> I pulled together the conclusions for this weeks call, and the other
> emails going back and forth, to make a new version of the adaptable links
> and buttons issue paper. I think it is now ready to be a proposal for
> WAI-ARIA extension for COGA.
>
> Please take a look and tell me what else it needs to be submitted as a
> first draft for ARIA to look at.
>
> see : https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/issue-papers/links-buttons.html
>
>
>
> When we have it all together it is easier to  see if there are  issues. So
> please review it carefully.
>
>
>
> I also pulled out of the draft of the gap analysis the content that is
> relevant for a WCAG extension. See
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Proposal_for_WCAG
>
> I think we should review it and then ask WCAG if this is in the right
> direction.
>
>
>
> Taking these two pieces out of the gap analysis may allow us more time to
> work on the other issue papers without delaying the dependent deadlines for
> WCAG or ARIA.
>
>
>
>
>
> All the best
>
>
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
>
>
> Athena ICT Accessibility Projects <http://accessibility.athena-ict.com>
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> , Twitter <
> https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>