- From: Rochford, John <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 19:04:35 +0000
- To: Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 4 May 2015 19:06:17 UTC
Hi Mike, The logic and explanations you provide in your issue paper are clear and well-considered. I enjoyed learning more about the ETSI approach to personalization. Reworking the issue paper to fit into our issue-paper template may be difficult. If you want to try, and Lisa thinks you should, I am willing to help. John John Rochford UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center Director, INDEX Program Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health http://www.DisabilityInfo.org Twitter: @ClearHelper [Facebook Button]<http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-England-INDEXShriver-CenterUMass-Medical-School/227064920160>[Twitter Button]<https://twitter.com/NEINDEX> [WordPress Logo] <http://www.disabilityinfo.org/blog/> -----Original Message----- From: Michael Pluke [mailto:Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com] Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2015 7:08 PM To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf Subject: Issue paper on interoperable personalization standards_v2.docx Attached is the, rather long, Issue Paper on interoperable personalization. Some proposals for how the TF might approach the subject are at the end of the paper. Best regards Mike
Received on Monday, 4 May 2015 19:06:17 UTC