RE: draft methodology

Hi John,
Thanks for reviewing.  I do not really understand the problem. Are you suggesting we do separate methodologies for items that are widely applicable to thoughs at are more limited in scope? This is just to identify gaps for what is need. It might be easier to explain it in the next call.

The abbreviations are explained - RS is explained below the key - but i will add again so it is easier.

All the best

Lisa Seeman

Athena ICT Accessibility Projects 
LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 23:11:09 +0300  Rochford<john.rochford@umassmed.edu> wrote ---- 

  Hi Lisa,
  
 My understanding about the gap analyses is that we are going to address techniques, accommodations, and issues in common across cognitive disabilities, then those unique to each disability. I don't see that approach reflected in the methodology.
  
 Also, I apologize, but I don't know the definitions of the abbreviations "RS" and "SC". Perhaps they could be spelled out upon their first appearances in the doc.
  
 John
  
 John Rochford
 UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
 Director, INDEX Program
 Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
 www.DisabilityInfo.org
 Twitter: @ClearHelper
  
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] 
 Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 3:28 PM
 To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf
 Subject: draft methodology
  
  
 Hi
 I made a draft for methodology for the gap analysis 
  
 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Methodology_for_gap_analysis
  
 It is a first draft, please comment, edit etc...
  
  
 All the best
  
 Lisa Seeman
  
 Athena ICT Accessibility Projects <http://accessibility.athena-ict.com> 
 LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> , Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>