RE: proposed resolution

Hi

Here is the link to it on github: https://w3c.github.io/wcag/coga/gap-analysis.html#aphasia-due-to-brian-injury


Editing it on the wiki is a problem because I will not know to add the changes to github. If you are having tucble with github it might be simpler to just send me/Michael the changes you want to put in by email, and we can add it to github.


We can also have a three way call on skype today if you are interested.


The task right now is to add access strategies to the techniques page.

All the best

Lisa Seeman

Athena ICT Accessibility Projects 
LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:08:43 +0200 EA Draffan<ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote ---- 

Many thanks Debbie but since working on the combined Wiki page http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis/non-vocal I am afraid I have lost touch with the contents as I could not access it on Github - I am not sure if everyone wanted to keep it all together so hesitated to finish the work. 
 
Perhaps we should see what everyone feels, as I am very aware that there is a considerable amount of overlap with many of these specific learning and cognitive disabilities in terms of techniques and I am struggling to see how a developer could cope with all the information. 
 
There is a wonderfully clear break down of some of the issues at different levels on this games site. http://gameaccessibilityguidelines.com/basic 
 
Best wishes 
E.A. 
 
Mrs E.A. Draffan 
WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton 
Tel +44 (0)23 8059 7246 
Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103 
http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk 
http://www.emptech.info 
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Deborah Dahl [mailto:dahl@conversational-technologies.com] 
Sent: 20 October 2014 23:18 
To: EA Draffan; 'lisa.seeman'; 'public-cognitive-a11y-tf' 
Subject: RE: proposed resolution 
 
Hi E.A., 
I'm very grateful for your offer of assistance on the aphasia techniques, especially because when I took the action I said that I wanted to work with you. sI think you're probably more knowledgeable than I am about aphasia. My background is more in the area of technology for aphasia rehabilitation. 
I was thinking that the writeup would be just about aphasia, because I don't know too much about non-vocal, but do you think there's enough overlap in techniques that including both in the same discussion would make sense? 
Best regards, 
Debbie 
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: EA Draffan [mailto:ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk] 
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 5:38 PM 
To: lisa.seeman; public-cognitive-a11y-tf 
Subject: RE: proposed resolution 
 
I am so sorry I sent apologies for not being able to attend to Lisa via the phone rather than the 'regrets' publicly - I must learn the right protocols. 
 
Debra – I saw in the minutes that you had an action to "add to techniques page on aphasia". I am very happy to help where I can and to read any drafts. However, I just wondered if this was building on the work we did amalgamating Aphasia with non-vocal? Or whether Aphasia is being treated separately as it was when the work started? 
 
Best wishes 
E.A. 
 
Mrs E.A. Draffan 
WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton 
Tel +44 (0)23 8059 7246 
Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103 
http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk 
http://www.emptech.info 
 
From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] 
Sent: 20 October 2014 18:06 
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf 
Subject: proposed resolution 
 
On the call today we had the following resolution: 
 
This group will have 48 hours for people to object to proposals before they can be come resolutions. Every day decisions can be resolved on the calls, Bigger/pivotal decisions to be ratified via the list. 
 
Let me know if you object to this. We will give 7 days to respond because this is important. 
 
All the best 
 
Lisa Seeman 
 
Athena ICT Accessibility Projects 
LinkedIn, Twitter