- From: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:08:43 +0000
- To: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>, "'lisa.seeman'" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, "'public-cognitive-a11y-tf'" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Many thanks Debbie but since working on the combined Wiki page http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis/non-vocal I am afraid I have lost touch with the contents as I could not access it on Github - I am not sure if everyone wanted to keep it all together so hesitated to finish the work. Perhaps we should see what everyone feels, as I am very aware that there is a considerable amount of overlap with many of these specific learning and cognitive disabilities in terms of techniques and I am struggling to see how a developer could cope with all the information. There is a wonderfully clear break down of some of the issues at different levels on this games site. http://gameaccessibilityguidelines.com/basic Best wishes E.A. Mrs E.A. Draffan WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton Tel +44 (0)23 8059 7246 Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103 http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk http://www.emptech.info -----Original Message----- From: Deborah Dahl [mailto:dahl@conversational-technologies.com] Sent: 20 October 2014 23:18 To: EA Draffan; 'lisa.seeman'; 'public-cognitive-a11y-tf' Subject: RE: proposed resolution Hi E.A., I'm very grateful for your offer of assistance on the aphasia techniques, especially because when I took the action I said that I wanted to work with you. sI think you're probably more knowledgeable than I am about aphasia. My background is more in the area of technology for aphasia rehabilitation. I was thinking that the writeup would be just about aphasia, because I don't know too much about non-vocal, but do you think there's enough overlap in techniques that including both in the same discussion would make sense? Best regards, Debbie -----Original Message----- From: EA Draffan [mailto:ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 5:38 PM To: lisa.seeman; public-cognitive-a11y-tf Subject: RE: proposed resolution I am so sorry I sent apologies for not being able to attend to Lisa via the phone rather than the 'regrets' publicly - I must learn the right protocols. Debra – I saw in the minutes that you had an action to "add to techniques page on aphasia". I am very happy to help where I can and to read any drafts. However, I just wondered if this was building on the work we did amalgamating Aphasia with non-vocal? Or whether Aphasia is being treated separately as it was when the work started? Best wishes E.A. Mrs E.A. Draffan WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton Tel +44 (0)23 8059 7246 Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103 http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk http://www.emptech.info From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] Sent: 20 October 2014 18:06 To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf Subject: proposed resolution On the call today we had the following resolution: This group will have 48 hours for people to object to proposals before they can be come resolutions. Every day decisions can be resolved on the calls, Bigger/pivotal decisions to be ratified via the list. Let me know if you object to this. We will give 7 days to respond because this is important. All the best Lisa Seeman Athena ICT Accessibility Projects LinkedIn, Twitter
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 06:09:14 UTC