RE: Last weeks action items on ADHD For ALL of us

Thanks – great job – are all the clinical assertions made in the text supported by references at the end?   Are all the references at the end mentioned in the text?   I tried to do a connecting of the two..
Some of the text didn’t seem to have supporting references included in certain sections (for example, symptoms and diagnosis sections).    Maybe link the embedded references in the text specifically to citations at the end (for example, “work-related issues [1]”, and then in references section “[1] American Psychiatric Association 2013” ).    The statements made seem to be of two types: clinical assertions concerning ADHD from research, and our conclusions for our purposes based in part on that research.   Don’t know if it would be useful to separate out those types more..

Also one typo “Diagnosis of ADHA”

Again great job  Best Tim

From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 6:09 AM
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf
Cc: Susann Keohane
Subject: Last weeks action items on ADHD For ALL of us


Hi Folks

Last week's meeting we agreed to look over the ADHD subgroup work at https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis/ADHD


Then Mary Jo and Susann are going to add the known comments as "todo items", and separate the comorbidity items (as discussed last week) and we will be ready to add it to the editors draft.

See http://www.w3.org/2014/09/29-coga-minutes.html


This is the main delay in getting the draft out as a working draft so let us try and have the comments over the next few days


All the best

Lisa Seeman

Athena ICT Accessibility Projects <http://accessibility.athena-ict.com>
LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>