W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Added literature review references

From: Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:19:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEsWMvSxS41rN5Nf3mCix=Jhrig8wqo7-5uWHTyjDyX_k4XOGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>

I need you to clarify what you mean by use that format?

Did you simply mean I should format the reference text to papers to be
as close as possible to this format

Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition), T. Bray, J.
Paoli, E. Maler, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, F. Yergeau, Editors. World
Wide Web Consortium, 16 August 2006, edited in place 29 September
2006. This edition of the XML 1.0 Recommendation is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/. The latest edition of XML
1.0 is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/.

With no links as we have none to use

It is not possible to use the specified reference syntax of [LANG] for
links on the page as wiki markup parser gets in the way. ie you cannot
get to ([<cite><a href="#ref-LANG">LANG</a></cite>]) in the output

The closest I can get to a working ref is [#LANG] with the ugly
<nowiki>[</nowiki>[[#LANG]]<nowiki>]</nowiki> markup You need to set
the anchor in the citation with <div id="LANG"></div>

When we comes to moving to HTML we'll have to reformat all refs.

Steve Lee
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com

On 23 July 2014 17:33, Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com> wrote:
> OK will do 2nd pass when next free
> Steve Lee
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
> On 23 July 2014 17:29, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
>> Fantastic work Steve, Thanks
>> We are using references style as per
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#References
>> All the best
>> Lisa Seeman
>> Athena ICT Accessibility Projects
>> LinkedIn, Twitter
>> ---- On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:23:24 +0300 Steve Lee<steve@opendirective.com>
>> wrote ----
>> I've added the literature review refs from 2 papers Peter Cudd co
>> published. There are a lot and as they are only paper citations I've
>> added at the end of the page. I sorted out those that seem most on
>> topic for us and a few that may be relevant, both based purely on the
>> paper title.
>> I also added some guidelines on language use from the second paper
>> Should we move the refs of page? At least until we've manage to read
>> them? How can we read them?
>> Steve Lee
>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 11:19:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:49 UTC