W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Added literature review references

From: Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:27:15 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEsWMvS2Do2hCT1vcjq4zfZVhSRkaB+v-NE3nkmU=g3zLe8N1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
I'll do my best but there are no URI's as these are potentially closed
papers (paper only or paid for AFAIK). I suppose I could search each
ref for an open copy, but thats plenty of work.

Steve Lee
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com


On 23 July 2014 17:29, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
> Fantastic work Steve, Thanks
>
> We are using references style as per
> http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#References
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> Athena ICT Accessibility Projects
> LinkedIn, Twitter
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:23:24 +0300 Steve Lee<steve@opendirective.com>
> wrote ----
>
> I've added the literature review refs from 2 papers Peter Cudd co
> published. There are a lot and as they are only paper citations I've
> added at the end of the page. I sorted out those that seem most on
> topic for us and a few that may be relevant, both based purely on the
> paper title.
>
> I also added some guidelines on language use from the second paper
>
> Should we move the refs of page? At least until we've manage to read
> them? How can we read them?
>
> Steve Lee
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>
>
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 10:27:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:49 UTC