- From: Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:03:58 +1000
- To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Cc: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Lisa thanks for this. I'd really like this 'conversation' to be revived. The changes in technology and the way we interact have changed and I think there is a really good case to be made for a constrained language and I think it can be handled in a relatively practical way these days. I am keen for a solution that is like a curb cut - good for everyone, especially helpful for those with a disability that can be avoided. Liddy On 14/04/2014, at 3:27 PM, lisa.seeman wrote: > I wrote this a long time ago > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/natural-lang-20030326.html about semantic > tagging language in place of controled or constrained language but > to the same ends > > I actually built it using word net and used it to aid automated > translations. It worked to some extent but not perfectly. > > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > Athena ICT Accessibility Projects > LinkedIn, Twitter > > > > > ---- On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:47:54 +0300 Liddy Nevile<liddy@sunriseresearch.org > > wrote ---- > > Lisa > I am not sure how to talk about what interests me in our task context > - the idea of having a constrained language so that we have a more > accurate and fast way of pivoting from one language to another, be > they different like sign language and icons or helpful to people with > reading and speech problems caused by cognitive disabilities? I would > quite like to be able to write something on the wiki and see what > people think about it... > > This is an area I want to research ... > > but don't think I can write on the wiki and am not sure where to write > it anyway... > > Liddy > > >
Received on Monday, 14 April 2014 11:04:11 UTC