- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 08:27:52 +0300
- To: Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org>, "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 14 April 2014 05:30:28 UTC
I wrote this a long time ago http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/natural-lang-20030326.html about semantic tagging language in place of controled or constrained language but to the same ends I actually built it using word net and used it to aid automated translations. It worked to some extent but not perfectly. All the best Lisa Seeman Athena ICT Accessibility Projects LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:47:54 +0300 Liddy Nevile<liddy@sunriseresearch.org> wrote ---- Lisa I am not sure how to talk about what interests me in our task context - the idea of having a constrained language so that we have a more accurate and fast way of pivoting from one language to another, be they different like sign language and icons or helpful to people with reading and speech problems caused by cognitive disabilities? I would quite like to be able to write something on the wiki and see what people think about it... This is an area I want to research ... but don't think I can write on the wiki and am not sure where to write it anyway... Liddy
Received on Monday, 14 April 2014 05:30:28 UTC