Re: Scheduling a presentation + discussion on plausible reasoning

Please confirm with a schedule invite thank you.
_____________________________________________________________________
@LubnaDajani  I  allternet.org  I  + 1 201 982 0934 (International)  + 31
(0) 622 09 6699


*Confidentiality Notice:* The information contained in this email and any
attachments is intended only for the recipient[s] listed above and may be
privileged and confidential. Any dissemination, copying, or use of or
reliance upon such information by or to anyone other than the recipient[s]
listed above is prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately at the email address above and destroy
any and all copies of this message.


On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 4:52 AM Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:

> Thanks for your responses, with people spread across the world, it doesn’t
> look like there is a single best time slot.  I am therefore thinking about
> arranging two teleconferences, one in the UK’s afternoon that would suit
> Europe and North America, and another that would be better for folks who
> can’t make that.
>
> How about 15:00 UK time on Wednesday 21st September for the first call?
>
> Bandon and Paola, can you suggest a slot that would better suit the two of
> you?
>
> Best regards,
> Dave
>
> On 5 Sep 2022, at 15:54, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>
> A gentle reminder to let me know of your interest ...
>
> The slides for the ATA workshop are now available at:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2022/09/ATA-Raggett-2022-09-12.pdf
>
> p.s. the demo now includes examples of using fuzzy quantifiers as I
> successfully implemented them as part of the plausible reasoning library
> module.
>
> On 1 Sep 2022, at 09:16, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>
> It has been a long time since our last teleconference for the Cognitive AI
> Community Group, and I would like to schedule a teleconference to present
> the work I have been busy on in respect to plausible reasoning, including a
> demo [1], and to invite discussion on the conjecture that plausible
> reasoning and human-like AI will eventually replace the semantic web.
>
> This follows on from the workshop on imperfect knowledge [2] that I
> co-chaired with William Van Woensel earlier this year as part of the
> Knowledge Graph conference (KGC-2022).  I am now looking forward to
> presenting the work on 12th September at the upcoming workshop on
> analogies: from theory to practice as part of the International Conference
> on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR) [3].
>
> In essence, plausible reasoning deals with imperfect knowledge, and mimics
> human argumentation for and against a premise in question. The plausible
> knowledge notation (PKN) is a proposed format that blends symbolic graphs
> with qualitative metadata in lieu of detailed statistics.  The demo
> presents a variety of examples including reasoning with analogies. I am
> currently extending it to further support fuzzy quantifiers such as few,
> many and most. Plausible reasoning subsumes fuzzy logic and qualitative
> reasoning.
>
> I am hoping to arrange the teleconference sometime in the week starting
> Monday, 19th September. Please email me directly to indicate which days and
> times (including timezone) are good for you, and I will then create a
> doodle poll to select the best slot.
>
> Best regards,
> Dave
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/Data/demos/chunks/reasoning/
> [2]
> https://www.knowledgegraph.tech/kgc-2022-workshop-representing-and-reasoning-with-imperfect-knowledge/
>
> [3] https://iccbr2022.loria.fr/analogies/
>
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>
>
>
>
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>
>
>
>
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>
>
>
>