Re: [public-cogai] <none>

Perhaps though, it's a reasonable prerequisite.

Idk.  Tweeting ATM.

I think the webizen concept (noting I have webizen.org happy to provide it
for open standards) might help address some of my biggest concerns, but
it's still a workaround.

Could be cleaner / better.. I absolutely doubt that you're not personally
supportive of human rights.
https://twitter.com/DemocracyAus/status/1588190893139369984

I've had a hard time, but alot of laws have changed; regardless of the
legacy issues.

Credentials still doesn't protect against human trafficking. I'm upset
about it, profits were made via decisions that could have been different;
and that's on them. Not me.
.
Tim.h.


On Fri, 4 Nov 2022, 1:09 am Dave Raggett, <dsr@w3.org> wrote:

> > On 3 Nov 2022, at 14:46, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > if there was some way the specification could say something like; 'these
> standards must serve the interests of mankind and the human rights
> instruments that apply in the region of the end-user’
>
> That would be something different from technical standards which focus on
> technical aspects, e.g. the IMG element in HTML for images in web pages.
>
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>
>
>
>