Re: [public-cogai] <none>

I didn't post the emails to the list. (Been working since ~9am, it's now
2am, apologies).

Also; I forgot to note, that I like your elegant solution. Working on it;
and as I go through your videos, I ponder other aspects (ie; temporal
resolution for the agent & any prerequisites it may require).

More (hopefully productively useful) feedback later.

Timh.

On Fri, 4 Nov 2022, 1:45 am Timothy Holborn, <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Fwiw; I saw this image recently,
> (Per attached); first, I thought, no. Not everything is energy, then I
> remembered E=mc2
>
> Our peaceful 🕊️🙏✌️ world is built upon Universal human rights.
>
> #AI, is challenging that, as active AI Agents (mostly operating on behalf
> of previously passive artificial persons/ corporations / "legal
> personalities", etc).
>
> Yet, I cannot see how they're able to vote against Universal human rights,
> if given the chance.
>
> Tim. H.
>
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022, 1:40 am Timothy Holborn, <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Oh crap.  Apologies.  It should read, that I believe you support human
>> rights! Perhaps it wasn't clear enough; and I'm paranoid about
>> "autocorrect"...
>>
>> I personally, need to reconfirm; my text was intended to say, I believe
>> you - by your work, to be an exceptional human rights advocate...  There
>> was no intent by me to say / make records that should ever suggest
>> otherwise.  I fear that wasn't clear.
>>
>> I believe the same of others, notwithstanding the politics. Trying to
>> help.
>>
>> Tim.h.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022, 1:28 am Timothy Holborn, <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps though, it's a reasonable prerequisite.
>>>
>>> Idk.  Tweeting ATM.
>>>
>>> I think the webizen concept (noting I have webizen.org happy to provide
>>> it for open standards) might help address some of my biggest concerns, but
>>> it's still a workaround.
>>>
>>> Could be cleaner / better.. I absolutely doubt that you're not
>>> personally supportive of human rights.
>>> https://twitter.com/DemocracyAus/status/1588190893139369984
>>>
>>> I've had a hard time, but alot of laws have changed; regardless of the
>>> legacy issues.
>>>
>>> Credentials still doesn't protect against human trafficking. I'm upset
>>> about it, profits were made via decisions that could have been different;
>>> and that's on them. Not me.
>>> .
>>> Tim.h.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022, 1:09 am Dave Raggett, <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > On 3 Nov 2022, at 14:46, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > if there was some way the specification could say something like;
>>>> 'these standards must serve the interests of mankind and the human rights
>>>> instruments that apply in the region of the end-user’
>>>>
>>>> That would be something different from technical standards which focus
>>>> on technical aspects, e.g. the IMG element in HTML for images in web pages.
>>>>
>>>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>