- From: Amélie Gyrard <amelie.gyrard@trialog.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:04:56 +0200
- To: public-cogai <public-cogai@w3.org>
- Cc: Ronald Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, paoladimaio10@googlemail.com
- Message-ID: <CAOkt=YmFONVLEx0JReMcT4_bCuAd_UdGszaCjPCndcVzegjjgg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, Regarding the definition of Cognitive AI, this book can help: - Artificial Cognitive Systems – A Primer [Vernon 2015] <https://www.amazon.fr/Artificial-Cognitive-Systems-David-Vernon/dp/0262028387> https://www.amazon.fr/Artificial-Cognitive-Systems-David-Vernon/dp/0262028387 If we are are not agree with those ones, we can compare the different definitions and common keyphrases/terms. I remember it explained the chunks as well. To me, chunks are similar to rules (from rule-based systems)[image: image.png] Le lun. 14 sept. 2020 à 08:01, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> a écrit : > Ron and all > > - since we are educating ourselves :-) - > I wonder if someone may know where the definition COG AI comes from > > I first started studying AI around the nineties, and got an MSC in 2000, > but we never used this term > we used KBS (knowledge based systems) > > here it says cognitive computing came about in 2014 > ttps://cognitivecomputingconsortium.com/definition-of-cognitive-computing/ > > thank you! > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:04 AM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thank you Ronald for setting this up >> I should be able to make it >> >> For me, AI has always been cognitive AI - probably because I started >> learning AI >> from knowledge based systems (long ago), I never felt the necessity to >> call AI cognitive >> (i understand that given the spike of ML this disambiguation may be >> useful now) >> at the same time, I have been practicing all along for thirty years >> (unlabelled, and unaware perhaps >> that a discipline was forming ) >> >> My suggestion is to try make the call a bit participatory, make sure that >> whoever is on the call >> can contribute to the call agenda and bring in their >> perspective/experience to whatever is the agenda goal >> >> Its good to learn but to "éducate'' sounds as if people dont know about >> cogAI already, like a bit patronizing perhaps? >> what about co-learn :-) >> >> I am a constructivist by nature >> >> P >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:38 AM Ronald Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello Cognitive AI Community group, >>> >>> Our first conference call is scheduled for >>> September 21, 2020 at 1 PM London time. >>> Contact information will be sent out later this week. >>> >>> The agenda is as follows: >>> >>> 1. Educate - gentle introduction to the topic of cog-ai >>> >>> 2. Outreach - Discuss how to extend reach out beyond >>> our current group. We seek to bridge the technical >>> clique mindsets as the topic is interdisciplinary. >>> It involves traditional AI (deep learning), >>> natural language processing, logic, pragmatics, >>> cognitive science, and semantic web. >>> >>> 3. Use cases - Understand and document business cases >>> especially around machine & human collaboration. This hopes >>> to drive funding. >>> >>> 4. AI ethics / explainability >>> >>> As we are still in the early stages, there is >>> much exciting work to be done, we need to consider >>> how to involve different orientations to incubate >>> a paradigm shift so that future intellectual effort >>> is exerted in the most effectively toward AI's ability >>> to enhance society. >>> >>> Please feel free to comment or make suggestions! >>> >>> -Ronald P. Reck >>> >>> >>> -- *Amelie GYRARD* TRIALOG SAS, 25 rue du Général Foy, 75008 PARIS✆ +33 1 44 70 61 25 ✉ amelie.gyrard@trialog.com www.trialog.com
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image.png
Received on Monday, 21 September 2020 13:06:16 UTC