- From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:21:18 -0700
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- CC: public-closingthegap@w3.org
On 4/15/2013 2:53 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Le vendredi 12 avril 2013 à 12:20 -0700, Wayne Carr a écrit : > >> Wouldn't Beacon in the proposed Performance WG charter be only for >> upload? Proposed charter says "An interoperable API for site developers >> to asynchronously transfer data from the user agent to a web server, >> with a guarantee from the user agent that the data will be eventually >> sent." >> >> Couldn't the download part be covered by the new WebApps offline storage >> topic elsewhere in your summary? > Possibly, although linking "download" to "offline" seems a bit > counter-intuitive :) I agree that it's likely that practically speaking, > the two would have to be linked in terms of technology definition. tip on html5rocks about using offline to speed download http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/speed/quick/#toc-appcache > >>> Possible W3C actions: >>> * short term: start a Community Group to draft a spec? (or bring it to >>> the existing Network-Friendly App and WebApp Best Practices CG?) >>> * increase resources in WebPerf Working Group to help speed up the work >>> >> Rather than a CG, could this be covered by providing use cases for >> Beacon and maybe resource priorities in the Performance WG and the new >> offline work in the Web Apps WG? > Yes, that's probably a reasonable approach. > > Dom > >
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 15:21:49 UTC