- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:53:38 +0200
- To: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
- Cc: public-closingthegap@w3.org
Le vendredi 12 avril 2013 à 12:20 -0700, Wayne Carr a écrit : > Wouldn't Beacon in the proposed Performance WG charter be only for > upload? Proposed charter says "An interoperable API for site developers > to asynchronously transfer data from the user agent to a web server, > with a guarantee from the user agent that the data will be eventually > sent." > > Couldn't the download part be covered by the new WebApps offline storage > topic elsewhere in your summary? Possibly, although linking "download" to "offline" seems a bit counter-intuitive :) I agree that it's likely that practically speaking, the two would have to be linked in terms of technology definition. > > Possible W3C actions: > > * short term: start a Community Group to draft a spec? (or bring it to > > the existing Network-Friendly App and WebApp Best Practices CG?) > > * increase resources in WebPerf Working Group to help speed up the work > > > Rather than a CG, could this be covered by providing use cases for > Beacon and maybe resource priorities in the Performance WG and the new > offline work in the Web Apps WG? Yes, that's probably a reasonable approach. Dom
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 09:53:54 UTC