- From: Claudius Teodorescu <claudius.teodorescu@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:21:40 +0200
- To: Dennis Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
- Cc: liam@w3.org, Casey Jordan <casey.jordan@jorsek.com>, "public-change@w3.org" <public-change@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPTZ0Vw_eG1XFo1QNEQStvVjoTQddxvEXGAjeOVhwry4D-bquQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, I am thinking about an EXPath module with function(s) about text content ranges (among others), to solve the problem of pointing for the changes of the text content. I can help with editing/maintaining it, as I am currently doing this for some other EXPath modules [1]. Claudius [1] http://extxsltforms.sourceforge.net/expath-specs/index.html On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org > wrote: > @Liam, > > Yes, all of those things can be done with XPath unadorned. But being able > to inspect or even match or substring a text item in a formula is not the > same as directing a path into the node that holds the text. Ditto for > pointing into the values of attributes, something that can be relevant for > the kind of lengthy attribute values that store spreadsheet cell formulas, > for example. I should perhaps been more emphatic about "find a path." > > I did wonder about those wonderful manipulations on the types of values in > nodes, but I couldn't reconcile that with setting a path except for > search-condition predicates. I think those just help filter us to an > intended node (and avoiding unintended ones). Getting to that last inch, > extending the path into the text (or attribute value) node itself, seems to > require augmentation of some kind. > > I'm fine with that. If there's some way that plain XPath can cross that > gap, I'm very interested. And I'm not disturbed by the need to augment > XPath, since there is need for other augmentation anyhow. > > - Dennis > > PS: Aside to @Casey. Although ODF spreadsheet cells don't have their > coordinates in the element for the cell, ones for OOXML spreadsheets do, > and that makes for great XPath access. I sympathize with the numeric > compactness desire. For the document formats I work with, that battle was > lost long ago [;<). > > I do find it interesting that it is easy to keep numerically-stepped path > sequences sorted in XML-document scan order. That makes it rather easy to > match up change-tracking operations with their targets in the XML, at least > to the element level. I don't know if it is a help or a hindrance when > editing. I suspect the tracked-change paths are best recomputed whenever a > modified document is persisted. But the simplicity of match-up on opening > a document for viewing or editing is something to look into. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Liam R E Quin [mailto:liam@w3.org] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 16:55 > To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org > Cc: 'Innovimax W3C'; public-change@w3.org > Subject: RE: XPath to identify a point in an XML document (Was: A sort of > synthesis) > > On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 15:07 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > [...] > > > It appears that XPath can find a text node, but not a path to the > > interior of that text node. (A text node is a string and never has > > adjacent text nodes -- it is the largest string that can be made > > without crossing a tag.) > > It depends what you mean by "find" - it can return a substring; XPath 2 > (and 3) can return a (node, offset) pair if you like. > > > XPath, even abbreviated XPath can be far "wordier" but it can also > > be simpler because it can short-circuit using full paths because it is > > based on a search model, not a strictly-navigational model. > > SoftQuad Panorama, years ago, used the nearest element ancestor with an > ID attribute, if there was one, and navigated from there, since IDs tend > to be relatively stable across document revisions. > > > For example, one advantage of an (augmented) XPath arrangement is the > > ability to find attributes via XPath. This means that one can find > > elements by known xml:id attribute values. > Yes, indeed. > > There are other aspects of XPath usage that might be used easier to > > confirm that the target has what is expected there (sort of the way > > patch software often works). > Yes, one can also use contains() to check for a string, for example. > > Liam > > -- > Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ > Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2013 08:22:10 UTC