- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:51:36 +0100
- To: public-change@w3.org
On 21/02/13 22:56, Casey Jordan wrote: > We use PI's as well, as Tom said there are many benefits. However we > only use the PI's to markup the regions and assign a small amount of > metadata (username, unique id etc), any comments or other information > associated with the change are stored outside the document in a > database. This way, if the change get's removed, accepted, or rejected, > the information surrounding it lives on in an audit record. This has > been very important for our customers. That's _really_ interesting because the HTML zealots never consider PIs as a potential solution to our real-life problems in editing environments ou publishing chains, they always base all their solutions on elements and attributes only, and that of course tweaks the structure of the document. </Daniel>
Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 07:52:01 UTC