Re: Slides for task force proposal to W3M

On 07/12/2013 08:39 AM, Coralie Mercier wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:21:13 +0200, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> On 07/11/2013 10:19 PM, Coralie Mercier wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear fellow participants of the task force,
>>>
>>> The draft slides for the proposal to W3M for the upcoming f2f meeting
>>> on 18-Jul are at:
>>>   https://www.w3.org/2013/Talks/cm-0718-cg2wg-woods/
>>>
>>> I will review them again tomorrow with Ian and expect to update them.
>>> I welcome your feedback and suggestions to improve them.
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> Coralie
>>>
>>
>> Minor point:   To what WG?
>>
>> # Ontology-Lexica (to existing W3C WG)
>
> I don't know. The source is the questionnaire. The chair of the CG 
> left this comment:
>
> [[ discussed with Ivan Herman who recommended to produce a vocabulary 
> and host it under W3C Vocab. ]]
>
> Maybe you know which existing W3C WG that would be?
>

Ah...  It's a (proposed) service, not a WG. 
http://www.w3.org/2013/04/vocabs/

Short version: we don't think WG's are a very good fit for vocabulary 
standardization; instead, CGs and some web-based coordination services 
will probably be better.   That's what the chair is thinking here, I think.

       -- Sandro


> Coralie
>
> # Sandro, unless you have a reason for not cc'ing the TF public list, 
> I would recommend you add it back in your reply. It's useful 
> discussion in scope of the TF.
>
>

Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 12:47:29 UTC