- From: <p.barnaghi@surrey.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:19:27 +0000
- To: <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, <phila@w3.org>
- CC: <public-ceo-ld@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AM3PR06MB115473AEDFDF736C3831FAE0BAA50@AM3PR06MB1154.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Phil, all, Please find attached a copy of the document with a few minor comments. Best, Payam ________________________________ From: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au> Sent: 09 February 2016 03:45 To: Phil Archer Cc: public-ceo-ld@w3.org Subject: CEO-LDReport 2016-02-01 Hi Phil, Here's a few updates from me. There is quite a lot about the OGC view of coverages on our sdw wiki (https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Cov_References by Peter Baumann, mostly) but that misses the newer OGC discrete global grid system which might actually suit us well - it builds hierarchies of nested cubes - with lower resolution nested in side lower resolution - I ma meeting with the chair of this gropu on Friday anyway and I can find out more then. Cov References - Spatial Data on the Web Working Group<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Cov_References> www.w3.org Grid coverages can be grouped into three categories of increasing complexity, based on CIM which in turn is based on GML 3.2.1 and GML 3.3): GridCoverage: not ... There was some work done at munster on coverage as a cube for linked data (pre-rdf datacube) but it provides a nice start. Kerry
Attachments
- application/msword attachment: CEO-LDReport 2016-02-24.doc
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2016 11:22:44 UTC