Re: Beginnings of a draft report

Thanks Payam,

Ed made some comments in a Google doc and I've incorporated his and your 
comments in the attached version.

I'd rather be using GH for this but I'm not sure whether that would suit 
all members of this group so I'm being cautious for now and just using 
Word - I hope it doesn't crash on you again.

Phil.

On 31/01/2016 23:42, p.barnaghi@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Please find attached a copy of the document with some minor comments;
> My MS Word crashed the first time and I lost all my changes; I tried to remember some of what I had written the 2nd time round.
>
> Best regards,
> Payam
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
> Sent: 29 January 2016 17:41
> To: public-ceo-ld@w3.org
> Subject: Beginnings of a draft report
>
> Dear all,
>
> In an effort to show progress and to ensure that our meeting in Beijing
> on 28 February is as productive as possible, I have made a tentative
> start on the document that I hope will evolve into our final report
> (attached*).
>
> It begins by re-stating some of the stuff from our initial meeting as
> captured in the report [1] and then makes a quick summary of the work
> Maik has been doing in Reading.
>
> @Maik - from an inexpert and all too quick review of your Coverage Data
> REST API Core Specification [2] it seems to me that you have already
> answered a lot of our key questions. I have added some questions to the
> doc that I suggest we can look at - I'd be delighted if there are ready
> answers to some or all of them and would be surprised if there weren't
> more that can be added.
>
> I am aware that this work has been done in one specific context and that
> it is crucial, of course, to see how this works in the contexts in which
> our Chinese colleagues work.
>
> @Maik - what is your/Reading/MELODIES' plan for this doc and its
> companions? Are you looking for it to become a formal standard? If so,
> we seem well placed to help ;-) You define some relationship types. The
> next iteration of the BP doc that Jeremy is co-editing will, I think,
> include the standard spatial and temporal relationships and, via that
> route, can be added to the Link Registry.
>
> I am painfully aware that as I write, China is shutting up shop ready
> for the Spring Festival. Beihang is now closed until 17th February and I
> imagine that will be the case for CAS as well.
>
> Comments, questions and additions to the doc please.
>
> Thanks
>
> Phil
>
>
> * I considered doing this on GitHub or Google Docs but, for now at
> least, a Word doc seems most likely to most convenient to the greatest
> number of people. But I do hope we can move to an online shared space
> quickly as passing round Word docs is a recipe for extra workload.
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2015/ceo-ld/kom
>
> [2]
> https://github.com/Reading-eScience-Centre/coverage-restapi/blob/master/spec.md#coverage-data-rest-api-core-specification
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1