- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:33:04 -0400
- To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Hi, CDF WG- The editor of the HTML5 specification is not convinced that MathML and SVG are the right choice for use in HTML. He apparently considers LaTeX and other formats as equally well suited as MathML [1], and VML and Windows Metafile format as equally well suited as SVG [2]. I don't know if he's genuine in this belief, or if he's merely setting expectations low so as to gain concessions to the markup and features allowed in text/html. I am inclined to believe that they are the most suitable formats (particularly SVG, though I find the arguments of the MathML advocates compelling, too); they have been designed from the ground up to be compatible with other Web technologies, specifially (X)HTML (and by extension HTML). However, he may be right that they do not fit within a vision for HTML which is a monolithic generalized language covering all domains of expression, as opposed to a framework of multiple interlocking languages where each performs a dedicated function with applicable semantics. This is the essence of CDF, of course, so as I mentioned at our last F2F, it may be that the best place for this to be specified is the the CDF WG, working closely with the HTML, XHTML, MathML, and SVG WGs. The CDF WG understands the importance of preserving the original formats of each language, and limits itself to defining the interactions between technologies. The HTML5 specification need only concern itself with the legacy requirements of the HTML language, and could provide a single point of extensibility, such as an <ext> element or a set of locations or circumstances under which other languages could be inserted. Naturally, the goal would still be to have the same DOM serialization in XHTML as in text/html. It would be a disservice to authors to introduce confusing incompatibilities. It's my belief that the markup itself should be a close as possible to the original formats as well, for the same reason. Given the momentum behind development in HTML in the browsers today, I think this may be the biggest bang for our buck, and I'd like to discuss this in our next telcon. What do you think? (Since we've agreed to act in public when the new charter goes through, I'm sending this to the public list, but also BCCing the CDF, MathML and SVG WG lists to make them aware. If you prefer to respond on the member-only list, I certainly respect your privacy.) [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Mar/0267.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Mar/0266.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2008 01:33:43 UTC